Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Visual Analysis 3 - Beautiful and Sublime


Visual Analysis 3

What is beautiful and what is sublime? The translator wants to divide them into two categories. However can the view not be taken in which the two are combined to form an overwhelming appreciation of both views? I think they can. The difference in enjoyable qualities has been separated by the author. One is the physical pleasures of the world in beauty and exercising experiences and the other is the appreciation of solitude and the coming of tranquility. One can see the intrinsic beauty in the sublime and the sublime in the beautiful. It is all viewed through the eyes.

Some say you can view the soul through the eyes. This may still be a form of seeing physical beauty. The viewer gazes into the deepest part of face, the pupil, and sees the depth of the soul. Can you really see the depth of one’s spirit through the pupil? This observation of the soul may be just the perception of the viewer. All you really see is the cornea, if you can see that deep. However the Chinese believe the chi is directed and channeled through the eyes. This makes sense as the eyes are the general directors of the body motion and kinetics. So it is possible that what is projected out the eyes is then connected to the one looking and vice versa. So in a way a very distant circuit connection has formed and a transmission of energy has occurred. What lies encoded on energy has more meaning than any word or sound. So what is appreciated is pure energetic beauty, but the sublime is still there. The translation of energetic meaning is still only what you as the viewer’s perceive it to be. It is an educated guess or a hypothesis based on the perception of the connection of overlapping energies. Energy peaks and troughs in waves much like the guessing of meaning. The circuit connection still exists and the peak is the elation of beauty and the trough the sublime moment of doubt. This is the moment of doubt in which the viewer is not exactly sure what is being transmitted is the message that the viewer needs. This moment of doubt can become overwhelming. Then hollow tubes of speech are thrown forth from the mouth encoded in waves of speculation. These tubes either reinforce the notion or further confuse the message. Either way tubular interaction confuses the energy translation. Affection reinforces the circuit connection and fills the hollow tubes that mold the spaces of the moment. This then creates another more intense circuit connection and the cycle continues again on a different level.

Now that energetic waves have been defined I will speculate more on stimulus. I must first set variables of emotional states. The sublime is a defined as a, “sensitivity of the soul”; and the beautiful defined as, “enjoying pleasures after their own fashion.” In regards to the sensitive soul it is understood that a lighter stimulus will have a less drastic effect upon mood. Compare a sunset of slow stimulus to a rave of loud forced sensation. This is the splendid beautiful garden and not the whorish advertisement of physical beauty. Therefore less energy is needed and the wave peaks and troughs on a less drastic scale. This still does not properly define the appreciation for the trough, but possibly the vibration of the trough. Why does someone enjoy the trough of joy? Perhaps the emotional median amplitude is lower than that of another person. This may be a result of a conglomeration of personal experiences throughout one’s life. This would make sense if the experiences of one’s life have been harsh and intense, for example having stress median amplitude of 50 where the norm is only 5. The only logical solution is to decrease the median. Stimulus is presented in waves of enjoyment are now taken in the lesser value as the soul strives for equilibrium. Still the sunset can be appreciated in the waves expressed by another’s eyes as equilibrium is found in the extended trough. In that extended trough is the beautiful garden where splendid beauty is found in the organization of the soul. But is it only the perception of the viewer that sees only what he wants to see? One may never know without the input of appropriate affectionate stimulus.

No comments:

Post a Comment